Regenerating used QCM sensors can seem to be a resource efficient way of running experiments. However, we generally do not recommend this approach. In this post, we explain why.
Cleaning used QCM sensors to be able to use them again could be considered a resource efficient approach seemingly saving both time and money. We often get questions on how to remove different types of samples from used sensors to make sure the surface is clean and back to the state it was before it was used in a measurement. Our general answer to this question, however, is that we do not recommend reusing sensors. The reason is that we as suppliers can only guarantee the quality of the sensors when they come directly from us, i.e., when they are new and unused. When you get the sensors from us, we can say that this is a good sensor, we know what’s on top of the surface and so on. But if you have used it once, and then try to remove the sample from the sensor surface, maybe you are not completely successful. There may be some leftovers from the old sample remaining at the surface and you might even change the chemical composition and/or the surface roughness of the sensor. This would mean that in the next experiment, you will not start with the same surface as you had in the previous one. If this is the case, you cannot expect high measurement reproducibility. This aspect is worth emphasizing because sensor regeneration is such a common question.
There might be cases where the measurement reproducibility is not that critical. Perhaps you are only after a yes/no kind of answer. Then reusing the sensor could potentially work for that purpose. However, it is then the responsibility of you as a user to evaluate if the data quality or reproducibility is good enough, we as supplier cannot take responsibility for the result.
If you want to learn more about QCM-D measurement best practice, we share some tips and tricks in the pod episode Collecting quality data with QCM-D – what to consider and pitfalls to avoid.
QSense Omni is designed to minimize the user knowledge required to produce high-quality QCM-D data.
The quality of the data produced by an analytical instrument is crucial and noise and drift play a significant role in determining the outcome.
Learn the guidelines on how to assess which method to use to quantify QCM mass.
Learn about what aspects to consider when setting up your QCM measurement
Learn more about QSense 4th generation QCM-D platform
Temperature stability is critical for reliable QCM data. Here are the top four factors that will help you eliminate temperature induced artifacts.
Sensitivity vs Limit of detection (LOD) - read about how they compare and why one is more imoprtant than the other.
Learn about lipid nanoparticle designs for drug delivery purposes and related research
Read about the key signatures in the QCM data that reveal if viscoelastic modelling should be used to extract the mass.
Jennie is Global Technical Product Manager for QSense at Biolin Scientific. She has a Master of Science in Bioengineering from Chalmers University of Technology and spent the first years after graduation focusing on membrane proteins and how to identify and characterize these in the best way. At Biolin Scientific, she has also worked as an Application Specialist for QSense, In-House Sales Manager, and Academy Manager.