Regenerating used QCM sensors can seem to be a resource efficient way of running experiments. However, we generally do not recommend this approach. In this post, we explain why.
Cleaning used QCM sensors to be able to use them again could be considered a resource efficient approach seemingly saving both time and money. We often get questions on how to remove different types of samples from used sensors to make sure the surface is clean and back to the state it was before it was used in a measurement. Our general answer to this question, however, is that we do not recommend reusing sensors. The reason is that we as suppliers can only guarantee the quality of the sensors when they come directly from us, i.e., when they are new and unused. When you get the sensors from us, we can say that this is a good sensor, we know what’s on top of the surface and so on. But if you have used it once, and then try to remove the sample from the sensor surface, maybe you are not completely successful. There may be some leftovers from the old sample remaining at the surface and you might even change the chemical composition and/or the surface roughness of the sensor. This would mean that in the next experiment, you will not start with the same surface as you had in the previous one. If this is the case, you cannot expect high measurement reproducibility. This aspect is worth emphasizing because sensor regeneration is such a common question.
There might be cases where the measurement reproducibility is not that critical. Perhaps you are only after a yes/no kind of answer. Then reusing the sensor could potentially work for that purpose. However, it is then the responsibility of you as a user to evaluate if the data quality or reproducibility is good enough, we as supplier cannot take responsibility for the result.
If you want to learn more about QCM-D measurement best practice, we share some tips and tricks in the pod episode Collecting quality data with QCM-D – what to consider and pitfalls to avoid.
Learn what dissipation in QCM-D reveals about the softness, hydration, and viscoelastic properties of surface-bound layers.
Learn how QSense QCM-D analyzes adsorption, fouling, PFAS interactions, microplastics and biofilms at environmental interfaces.
Analyze surfactant-surface interactions with QSense QCM-D in real time to reveal adsorption dynamics, layer properties and rinse stability.
Learn how QSense QCM-D characterizes polyelectrolyte multilayer build-up and the resulting film’s thickness, softness and growth mode.
Read about how molecule-surface interaction processes and binding can be characterized by QCM-D via time-resolved measurements of mass and thickness.
Learn how QCM-D studies reveal PFAS–sorbent interactions and guide sorbent design for more sustainable PFAS treatment.
QSense QCM-D reveals lipid bilayer formation and hydrated model membrane structures that can be difficult to capture with other methods.
QSense QCM-D reveals in real time how thin films degrade and are removed, from cleaning and detergency to corrosion, etching and degradable coatings.
Learn how QSense QCM‑D reveals time‑resolved reagent–mineral interactions, linking surface chemistry to flotation performance in mineral processing.
Jennie Ringberg is a former employee at Biolin Scientific. She was the Global Technical Product Manager for QSense and also held roles as Application Specialist for QSense, In-House Sales Manager, and Academy Manager. Jennie holds a Master of Science in Bioengineering from Chalmers University of Technology and spent the first years after graduation focusing on membrane proteins and how to identify and characterize these in the best way.