When choosing a QCM-D instrument, there are several aspects to take into consideration. If you have identified automation and reproducibility as critical factors for your needs, both the QSense Omni and QSense Pro excel in these areas. Even though there are similarities, the two products are tailored to different needs and have their respective unique strengths. This guide aims to help you decide which instrument best suits your requirements by providing a detailed comparison of their features and capabilities.
Both QSense Pro and QSense Omni were designed with high throughput, low sample volume, and high reproducibility in mind. In addition to that, however, the two products have their unique niche.
The QSense Pro platform is ideal for large-scale QCM-D analysis, enabling real-time study of molecular interactions at surfaces and interfaces. The platform is designed for automation, it enhances productivity and reproducibility compared to manual instruments. This fully automated system is engineered to maximize efficiency, making it the optimal choice for comprehensive and precise QCM-D analysis.
QSense Omni is the newest member of the QSense family, representing a significant advancement in QCM-D technology. It delivers exceptional performance and data quality, allowing for high-quality and reliable QCM-D data generation. This 4th generation modular and upgradeable instrument suite is designed to simplify and enhance the research process, making it easier for scientists to obtain precise and trustworthy results. In a nutshell, QSense Omni combines automation with flexibility. It also gives you the sharpest QCM-D data and instrument ease of use.
With that said, some differences stand out when comparing the two systems
|
Feature |
QSense Pro |
QSense Omni, 4 channels |
|
7-harmonic QCM-D |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Volume (minimum required in flow mode) |
50 µl
|
90 µl
|
|
Throughput (measurement channels) |
2x4 |
4 |
|
Automated liquid management |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Automated sample pre-mixing |
Yes |
No |
|
Live script editing |
No |
Yes |
|
Direct injection |
No |
Yes |
|
Guiding software |
No |
Yes |
|
Independent channels (Temperature and flow) |
No |
Yes |
|
Probe-based liquid handling |
Yes |
No |
|
Footprint (cm) |
67 x 57 |
43 x 36 |
|
Number of consecutive samples |
Up to 96 (96-well plate) |
8 |
Both the QSense Omni and QSense Pro are automated instruments, each designed to meet specific research needs with distinct strengths. The Pro is ideal for large-scale, high-throughput analysis, while the Omni combines automation with flexibility and excels in providing the sharpest data.
Get the instrument specifications below for a more detailed comparison of the two instruments
Discover how QCM-D analysis reveals real-time etching dynamics, helping optimize cleaning processes and protect surfaces from unwanted damage.
Discover how QSense QCM-D helps tackle fouling challenges across industries
Discover how QCM-D enables real-time, label-free analysis of supported lipid membrane formation, structure, and dynamics for advanced research
Learn how QSense QCM-D analysis can reveal membrane fouling dynamics and optimize cleaning strategies for more efficient water treatment
Learn how QSense QCM-D helps detect and prevent surface-induced instabilities in biologics. Join our webinar for insights and practical examples.
Learn about the top QSense sensors for analyzing biopharmaceutical drug-surface interactions in the context of IV bags.
Learn about QCM-D, Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation monitoring - an analytical tool for surface interaction studies at the nanoscale.
Explore QSense QCM-D sensors to optimize cleaning efficiency with real-time insights, enhancing formulations and protocols across various conditions.
Learn how how run small volume measurements with QSense Omni
Jennie Ringberg is a former employee at Biolin Scientific. She was the Global Technical Product Manager for QSense and also held roles as Application Specialist for QSense, In-House Sales Manager, and Academy Manager. Jennie holds a Master of Science in Bioengineering from Chalmers University of Technology and spent the first years after graduation focusing on membrane proteins and how to identify and characterize these in the best way.