A prerequisite of successful data analysis is good input data, and it all starts with the baseline. In this blogpost, we talk about key characteristics of a quality QCM-D baseline and how to get there.
The data analysis output will not be better than the input, and it is therefore important to optimize the data quality when performing the measurement to maximize the analysis output. A good baseline is key to be able to properly analyze the data and draw conclusions. By studying the baseline, and interpreting what it tells us, we can give ourselves the best chances of quality data. The baseline should not be too short and not drifting.
A good baseline needs to be stable, otherwise we cannot draw any conclusions from the experimental data. What is stable enough, however, depends on what is being measured. If you expect quite large shifts in the QCM-D signals, then you may not have to be as strict about the baseline as you would have to be if you are to measure very small f and D shifts.
If you look at an inert surface in water at room temperature, you can expect a drift < 1 Hz/hour for the frequency and < 0.15∙10-6 for the Dissipation. Also, the noise should be low. It should be < 0.2 Hz (S.D, standard deviation) for the frequency and 0.05 ∙10-6 (S.D) for the dissipation. For a specific experiment, however, it depends on the chemistry involved, how low these numbers can be.
Figure 1. A section of a QCM-D baseline showing a set of frequency curves.
Let us also look at some baseline examples to see if these are good or not.
The QCM-D measurement shown in Fig. 2 includes several steps, and we see both mass uptake and mass loss from the sensor surface. The baseline in this measurement is however too short to be useful. We cannot say anything about the baseline when it looks like that. For example, we cannot be sure that the baseline is not drifting, and thereby affecting the rest of the measurement. Therefore, we cannot say much about how trustworthy this data is. To be able to trust that there is no drift or significant processes in the background that interferes with the measurement, the baseline should be stable for at least 5 minutes.
Figure 2. QCM-D data, exported from QSense Dfind, showing a baseline that is too short.
In Fig. 3, we see a measurement of polymer addition to a surface. In this measurement, the baseline is drifting. We therefore cannot really say anything about the results. We cannot assume the drift in the baseline would have been the same throughout the measurement. Perhaps the drift was due to some contaminant that was adsorbing for a while and then normalizing. Perhaps it was due to temperature adjusting. Perhaps the reason for drift was contaminants being rinsed off the sensor surface. Since we cannot know what the reason of the drift is, we cannot draw any conclusions about results when starting with drift. The measurement should not have been started until the baseline was stable.
Figure 3. QCM-D data, exported from QSense Dfind, showing a baseline that is drifting.
So, how should you handle a situation where you see this kind of drift when you start the measurement? What you need to do is to rinse longer to see if you can achieve a better baseline. If the baseline does not stabilize over time, you need to consider if your instrument, sensor, buffer, and accessories were clean enough. Any contaminants will affect your results and is something you want to avoid at any time.
Good data is a prerequisite for successful data analysis - the analysis output will not be better than the input. A good baseline is key to be able to properly analyze the data and draw conclusions. The baseline should not be too short and not drifting
Download the guide to learn more about how to optimize the baseline so that you can get the most out of your collected data.
Register for the webinar
Read the guidelines on how to decide which QCM instrument will be the most suitable for your needs
Read about how protein adsorption at various surface and solution conditions quickly can be measured
Read about what single-harmonic and multi-harmonic QCM-D means and what the difference is between these instruments.
Read about how QSense QCM-D analysis is used as a powerful tool to investigate protein-lipid nanoparticles binding affinity
Learn about the difference between the theoretical QCM sensitivity and the sensitivity which is relevant in a measurement situation.
Read about the piezoelectric effect and how piezoelectricity arises
Learn more about QSense 4th generation QCM-D platform which provides a sharper tool in the scientist toolbox and simplifies data interpretation.
Learn about how biointerfaces and biomolecular interactions can be studied using QSense® QCM-D and what information these measurements offer.
Read about Prof. Jackman's experience using QCM-D to study surfactant-interaction with model membranes
Sign upp for the webinar to learn more about how QCM-D is used to study biomaterial-induced activation of the immune system
Learn about what aspects to consider after you have run a QCM measurement
Jennie is Global Technical Product Manager for QSense at Biolin Scientific. She has a Master of Science in Bioengineering from Chalmers University of Technology and spent the first years after graduation focusing on membrane proteins and how to identify and characterize these in the best way. At Biolin Scientific, she has also worked as an Application Specialist for QSense, In-House Sales Manager, and Academy Manager.